@publicvoit I'd have to write a bigger reply to this, but in this whole surge in popularity of Zettelkasten there seems to be a recurring misunderstanding: Zettelkasten is *not* meant to keep todo's. Maintaining a ZK with the goal of managing tasks is a perversion of what it actually is: an interconnected collection of thoughts and ideas, which one can traverse to reconstruct thoughts or come up with new ideas, and (most importantly) a place where one writes and does intellectual labour.

@EFLS I agree. However, so far, I haven't had to make a difference. When I was at notes/software/Emacs/Org/knowledge-management, I could add a "test ZK" task as well. With a ZK, I'd have to use a different location for that task.

@publicvoit Yes, but that is because the "test ZK" task itself is vastly different from a note with thoughts on ZK, a note which might become a node in a broader web of thought. My point is that your critique about adding new todo's is mistaken because Zettelkasten is not meant to maintain todo's. Put even more directly: I'm convinced that a ZK in which one tries to keep todo's will fail as a ZK. But perhaps I should take the time to write that out more elaborately.

@EFLS I totally agree that ZK is not the framework for todos. However, what I don't know yet is how to mitigate this in real world scenarios where I want to create a todo that is related to a node in my ZK.
How to choose a spot for it without losing the connection?

@publicvoit Ah, from your blog post I understood you wanted to mix in todo's, but that might be a misunderstanding on my part. In any case, I simply add a link from the Org todo to the relevant note. I imagine the type of link depends on the type of software you use, but ultimately it should be the unique note ID in your Zettelkasten.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
graz.social

Mastodon ist ein freies, dezentrales soziales Netzwerk. Diese Instanz hat einen Fokus auf den Grazer Raum und Österreich. Jedoch sind alle willkommen!